« Toshiba Portégé M800: Like an Apple MacBook face

Firmware 2.01 breaks PwnageTool, could render iPhone 3G un-unlockable »






Aug
5

Do you think an Apple iPhone Nano is really needed?

Posted by Phones Review in BLOGROLL, DESIGN, INTERNET, MARKETING, MEDIA, MOBILE

Yesterday I posted on the possibility of an Apple “iPhone nano” before Christmas; it does seem a valid rumour as it came from one of the major UK newspapers, but even if this rumour is true, is there really a call for an “iPhone nano”?

Basically an “iPhone nano” would be a smaller compact version of an iPhone, but if you take the Apple iPhone as it stands isn’t it what it is because of its large screen, large storage capacity, its 3G, and numerous other features it incorporates these make it the success that it has become.

I am none too sure if the same could be said for an “iPhone nano”; why would there be a call to strip down the iPhone to put forward a smaller less feature packed device?

I think the idea may be to appeal to those who want a pay-as-you-go device and at a cheap price of £150.00, but doesn’t that defeat the point of the Apple iPhone evolving to 3G?

I’m curious to see what our reader think on the possibility of an “iPhone nano”, so would you like to find one sitting in your Christmas stocking?

Source – product-reviews


RELATED SURF

  1. Will we see an Apple iPhone nano by Christmas?
  2. Apple iPhone Nano: Is a smaller form factor needed?
  3. Apple iPhone nano patent application evidence
  4. Christmas 2008: Apple nano PAYG O2 iPhone
  5. Apple iPhone 3G with slide-out QWERTY keyboard: is it needed?

VIA @ [ Phones Review ] - 1 Views


Comments are closed.